Marie Claire

Marie Claire's "Fashion 401K" Revolutionizes My Retirement Planning

Marie_claire_sept_fashion_401k_2

Times are tough! The economy is shaky, and my retirement portfolio is leaking money. But thanks to Marie Claire’s in-depth reporting on investment plans, I no longer have to wade through a stack of dry prospectuses in a quest to find a safe haven for my hard-earned cash. Instead, I’ll just follow their suggestions and put my money into high-yield, high-end fashion! After all, according to “Fashion 401K” in the September issue, these pricey clothes “earn interest as you wear them.” Shopping for designer goods is just like opening a savings account, only far more stylish!

Fashion-mag love advice is less than ideal • In my August column, find out the meaning behind his manscaping (that’s from Cosmopolitan, obviously); why a jar of mustard might be the most appealing accessory ever; and the surprising activity Marie Claire suggests is best done alone—and naked. I’m fretting about fashion-mag relationship ideals in this month’s installment on The Frisky.

We Read It So You Don’t Have To: Marie Claire’s Guide to Surviving Unemployment

So! Times are tough! The world is spinning out of control, and even Marie Claire is feeling the pinch—they couldn’t decide which of the four Sex and the City cast members to put on the cover, and thus they attached four covers to the July issue. See? Out of control! Marie_claire_july_sarah_jessica_p_3

But Marie Claire knows life isn’t all Cosmos and Louis Vuittons. The July article “Surviving a Layoff” purports to provide the inside track on spotting—and getting past—a layoff unscathed. Well, I was laid off in April. When I saw the article teased on the cover, I actually felt a twinge of hope. Marie Claire was feeling my pain! Marie Claire was a trusted friend, ready to guide me through the dark hours of eating cereal in my pajamas at noon!

I was wrong.

The tales of three recently jobless women are included in the story. Since being mostly unemployed means I have tons of free time, and refreshing online job posting sites every ten minutes and waiting for the phone to ring is eating my soul, I read them all!

1. Layoff Victim #1 was an investment banker who brought home a hefty paycheck—a base salary of $85,000, and a bonus that could equal that. But she secretly hated her job! When her company let her go during a cost-cutting binge, she received six months’ pay and benefits. So she did what any recently laid-off woman would do: took a vacation to Florida! Now, apparently still living off her severance package, she’s decided to leave banking and, instead, break into the world of voiceover artistry. “I’ve always wanted to be in a cartoon,” she giggles. [“Giggles”  is their word, not mine, just for the record.]

2. Layoff Victim #2 was a TV news producer in Florida. When she lost her job, she was worried about also losing her $2000/month condo. Solution: take from retirement savings and borrow from Mom and Dad to pay the bills, but don’t give up too much! “You work so hard to get to a certain income level. Then you’re forced to limit yourself. I don’t think I should make myself have to live that way,” she says. LV2 is reconsidering her love of journalism and now spends her days blogging and “beefing up her Myspace page.” Seriously.

3. Layoff Victim #3 was let go a mere 106 days into a stint at Yahoo. Apparently important to her story is the detail that she had her own washer and dryer in her apartment. Poor thing, right? Read on! Within two days of being laid off, there were “several posts on well-read blogs” about her layoff, which lead to two job offers that were “less than perfect.” What our LV gained is confidence—she turned down those offers and has instead written a self-published book called Laid-Off Renegade. No word on whether the book is paying the bills or if she’s been forced to switch to the laundromat—because she lost her job in February 2008, and when you factor in Marie Claire’s lead time, was probably interviewed just days later. So she’s totally knowledgeable about the long-term ramifications of being laid off!

There is a brief sidebar that contains solid information about how to spot whether your job is on the chopping block. However, there are no pointers about financial planning or finding new employ, unless the anecdotes about voiceover classes and borrowing from your parents are what Marie Claire considers to constitute such advice. Or maybe they just figure we unemployed can’t afford the $3.50 cover price and aren’t reading this anyway.

Magazines Acknowledge The Cost of Clothes: A Recession Fashion Rundown

So, the U.S. is teetering on the brink of a recession. While there is a smattering of financial advice scattered throughout the July issues, the magazines focus on something far more important than investments and job security: looking good! Priorities! The best investment to weather an economic crisis is, apparently, your wardrobe. I’m no financial expert, but based on what’s in the magazines this month, I will say this: If Forever 21 ever goes public, buy.

Nearly all the magazines offer looks at lower prices, but considering the source, lower-priced is not necessarily low-end. Here’s a breakdown of the style sticker shock:

Bazaar

One page of “Hottest, Newest, Latest” is devoted to “fashion at AFFORDABLE prices.” It was wise to emphasize the word “affordable,” because otherwise—well, see for yourself.

Total number of deals: 6

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $69 Banana Republic scarf

Most expensive bargain: A $395 Elie Tahari clutch

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $140 J. Crew flats

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $450,000 Neil Lane for De Beers bracelet

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: A $46,650 Balenciaga dress. No, it isn’t woven from gold. Why do you ask?


Cosmopolitan

“How to Shop Summer Sales” blends fashion with suggestions to befriend a saleswoman and keep your receipts for price adjustments. Original!

Total number of deals: 14

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $49 dress from Macy’s

Most expensive bargain: A $158 necklace, Marc by Marc Jacobs

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $48 DKNY jeans

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $575 3.1 Philip Lim dress

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Cosmo neglects to list prices for the most expensive items, like the YSL cardigan worn by a model riding a jetski. Where else would you wear such a sweater?

Elle_july_marykate_olsen_2

Elle

An eight-page spread, “Le Cheap, C’est Chic!,” is annoyingly teased on the cover with the line “No She Didn’t!” Because, you know, spending less than $150 on an item of clothing is totally a novel lifestyle choice and not a necessity!

Total number of deals: Who can tell what Elle thinks is “cheap”? They’ve got Forever 21 mixed with Burberry.

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $6 bead necklace and, the fashion find of the century, a $7 Hanes t-shirt. Thanks for uncovering that hidden gem, Elle!

Most expensive bargain: Elle’s “inexpensive” clothes are paired with thousands of dollars of jewelry, as if that’s the only way to redeem them. The highest-priced piece in “Le Cheap” is a $3,990 diamond ring.

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $48 Levi’s denim shorts worn by Mary-Kate Olsen

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $5,600 Marchesa satin dress

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Ludicrous $300 square sunglasses by Luella by Linda Farrow. People aren’t actually going to buy those, right? Right?


Glamour

Bargains are splashed across one page, “Summery work stuff—all less than $40,” and a high-low feature, “Your Summer Extras.”

Total number of deals: 12 for sure; the high-low feature doesn’t designate what is what. A $40 scarf could go either way.

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $10 Shop Suey ring

Most expensive bargain: A $70 Roberta Freymann tote (assuming this is what counts for low-end in Glamour’s universe. Since another page in the same story features a $795 straw hat, I think it must.)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $25 Chinese Laundry belt

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: The $12,000 Louis Vuitton Speedy mentioned here

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Gotta be that hat.


InStyle

An anemic single page is devoted to “Deals & Steals.”

Total number of deals: 7

Their idea of dirt cheap: $14 aviator sunglasses by Shop Suey

Most expensive bargain: A $139 MNG by Mango dress

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $18 American Apparel t-shirt

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $88,000 Van Cleef and Arpels ring

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: An $18,000 Donna Karan crocodile bag. It’s just a purse.


Lucky

An entire feature, “The Season’s Best Looks Under $100,” is given over to low-price style.

Total number of deals: 67

Their idea of dirt cheap: An $18 Mossimo for Target top

Most expensive bargain: Tie: at $99, a “tiered maxiskirt” by WDNY International and a Tommy Hilfiger cotton dress

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $7 Metro 7 tank top

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $1,465 bracelet by Steven Dweck

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Chanel charges $1,225 for a belt. A belt! I regret not launching a career in luxury fashion.


Marie Claire

They’ve spread the discounts throughout: there’s one page of “101 Ideas,” one page of “Splurge vs. Steal,” and a feature, “Black & White,” that’s high-low.

Total number of deals: 40

Their idea of dirt cheap: $7 Hue socks (Thanks, Marie Claire, I was really overspending on socks.)

Most expensive bargain: $300 Marciano shoes (worn with the $7 Hue socks, natch)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $5.80 Forever 21 sunglasses

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $18,800 Cartier ring

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: A Chanel top and skirt set that retails for the low, low price of $10,745.


Self

Looks like all the clothes shown in the  fashion features under $100, which is excellent.

Total number of deals: 100, according to the cover

Their idea of dirt cheap: It’s a tie at $8 for a Forever 21 necklace and Old Navy earrings

Most expensive bargain: Another tie, this one at $99, for a Nahui Ollin tote, an RJ Graziano necklace, and a $99 Tommy Hilfiger clutch. Those are special prices for Self readers, however, so this hews dangerously close to cheating.

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: See above for $8 jewelry.

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: That tank top Anne Hathaway is wearing on the cover? Yeah. It’s $845, and she’s wearing it with necklaces whose combined total is $5,300.

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: $49 jelly shoes, but probably only because I’m old enough to remember buying jellies the first time around.

Vogue_july_nicole_kidman_2

Vogue

In “The Economists,” Vogue editors offer “inspired finds under $500 (plus one key investment piece).” Oh, thank god, because I needed help to find clothes that cost so little.

Total number of deals: 31, not counting the home décor and investment pieces

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $127 Sykes London belt

Most expensive bargain: Seven items retail for $495, including a John Varvatos coat, a Moschino Cheap and Chic skirt, and a  3.1 Philip Lim dress. (You didn’t think they’d go four whole pages without mentioning Lim, did you?)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $150 YSL dickey

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $16,600 Cartier watch

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Hands down, the dickeys were the most egregiously priced items I saw in any of the magazines. Vogue featured two: a $150 YSL version and a $395 Prada one. That’s an awful lot of scratch for something that isn’t even a real shirt.

How Marie Claire Ruined My Day

I used to read magazines in part because of the escapism they offered. After a stress-inducing week at a lousy job, I’d pick up a couple of magazines and spend a blissful evening reading about glamorous lives and exclusive couture.

No longer.Marie_claire_june_heidi_klum

Sure, magazines still offer some sliver of escapism, but reading the June issue of Marie Claire was like delving into a world that’s worse than the one I actually live in. They’ve dubbed this “The Body Issue,” but really, it’s the bloody depressing issue. The intrepid staffers manage to put a negative slant on every single feature.

It starts on the cover with this:

Mighty Heidi Klum Recommends Sex in an Igloo

So it’s not enough for her to be a successful, beauty-standard-setting Teutonic blonde, but now my sex life is inadequate too? And an igloo? How would I even get access to one of those?

In case you haven’t already given up on liking your body—and if you’re a regular reader of women’s magazines, you probably have!—the swimsuit edition of “101 Ideas” will pound any shred of self-esteem out of you. To be fair, they’ve made a modicum of effort to acknowledge that one size does not fit all. Apparently, there are vastly different ways in which women can be scrawny blondes!

There’s skinny-blonde-with-a-prodigious-rack Katherine Heigl, whom the magazine dubs “curvy.” If her picture above the words “Flaunt a full figure” isn’t enough to make you skip lunch, then you’re a more secure person than I am. The next page bears Kate Hudson, who is somehow the embodiment of an “athletic” figure. Even more baffling, the page quotes Gabrielle Reece, who, as an athlete, actually possesses an athletic figure! Perhaps she isn’t blonde enough to appear here. Finally, there’s “petite,” represented by the wispy Kate Bosworth. I can’t quibble with that characterization of Bosworth, although “she can’t possibly eat solid food” is probably more accurate. That covered everyone, right? Next page!

More body anxiety-inducing style lurks on page 58, where “Fashion Prediction” touts capris:

Don’t get caught with your pants hem down. Think cropped…with ankle-enhancing chunky shoes.

Ankle-enhancing? That may have been last body part I wasn’t worried about.

It goes on: “Project Heidi” reveals that Klum really does look that good in person. The “Bulletin” overflows with gloominess: it crams disaster survival, a democracy activist’s death in Iraq, and students lobbying for the right to carry guns on campus into three pages. (There’s more there, too, including the flash that $399 iPhones are the preferred gift for Father’s Day. Uh, not this year, Dad. Sorry.)

Then there’s “Women Harassing Men,” about the rise in women sexually harassing men in the office. This story will forcibly disabuse you of any silly notion that females might actually abstain from the kind of behavior to which we’ve been subjected. Equality means different things to different people, I guess. Next, “I Married A Terrorist” is the story of a woman who, well, you know.

Even theoretically joyous events—weddings—are morphed into a relentless negative. Thinking of inviting friends to your nuptials? Don’t bother! They don’t want to come! “How to Survive Wedding Season” offers not-at-all-bitter essays with titles like:

• When Brides Attack

• Three Reasons It’s a Bad Idea to Hook Up with Three Guys at the Reception

and

• Hello Wedding Season, Good-Bye Savings

Are you still with me? Immediately following that heartfelt celebration of wedded bliss comes “Losing Stephanie.” The only photos of the aforementioned Stephanie are from the past, while her husband and kids are shown “at home in 2008,” so right away, it’s clear this story doesn’t have a happy ending. Stephanie was diagnosed with Creutzfeld-Jakob disease, one of those inexplicable, horrifying deaths that women’s magazines specialize in. Here’s what the doctor told her family:

CJD is one of a group of degenerative brain disorders…in which it is believed that an infectious and indestructible form of a protein called a prion invades the brain and creates spongelike holes. As the brain disintegrates, the human or animal descends into dementia and loses all control of its body. There is no treatment for CJD; it is 100 percent fatal.

Writer Gretchen Voss explains that the disease is believed to be linked to mad-cow disease. Worst of all, it has an incubation period of 30 years—meaning we could all be nursing this fatal disease right now. Still not drained enough to throw the magazine across the room? Keep reading!

A few dozen fashion pages intervene, offering up the usual outrageously thin women in fantastically expensive clothes, with the only atypically pleasing element being a non-white model in “Nightglo.” Then, two features add a lamentable dimension to otherwise positive tales of transformation.

First up, Ariel Levy’s acne memoir “Out, Damned Spot!” The good: her skin clears up, finally, thanks to a new laser treatment. The bad: The treatment is $500 a session, and she requires “several” after the initial three sessions. Next, diet-book authors Neris Thomas and India Knight celebrate dropping pounds with an entirely sensible regimen they devised. But even losing 70 pounds has its downside. This is Thomas’ final quote:

 

I kind of thought everything suited me when I lost the weight. We both spent so much money, it was a disaster! I’m sure our next book will be Happier Women, Loads of Debt.

Because I am a masochist, I persisted. The Love/Sex section includes the confession of a man who ended his relationship with the woman he dubs the “One for Me” because of an addiction to online dating—and surprise! None of the women he’s met online since have lived up to her. Then Maura Kelly meets a man who pressured her to pop a Xanax on the first date—which I’m going to go out on a limb and declare a dealbreaker. He tells her:

 

“It makes you forget all your hang-ups. You become the real you.”

If you have the tiniest shred of faith in humanity remaining, the final page of the magazine will kill it with the cattiness that is endemic in fashion mags:

White pants: If your thighs are wider than this caption, pass.

And if you want to feel the slightest bit of joy ever again, pass on this issue. Excuse me, please—I need to go look at some puppies.

Marie Claire: Christina Aguilera is Very Thorough with the Self-Tanner

Quoted on the cover:

When I found out, I started shaking.

Which is funny, because that’s pretty much what happened to us when we saw this.

Marie_claire_january_christina_agui

Other unintentionally hilarious cover lines:

1.  “How I learned to love the mother I hated”

2.  Sexy winter skin

3.  Tanning, bleaching, botoxing:  Are you obsessed?  (Already done.)

Lowest Common Denominator: Marie Claire, December

0: Number of cosmetic procedures Nicole Kidman claims to have had in “Nicole Kidman Spills…”

0: Amount of credibility that statement holds when compared to the cover photo and this particularly jarring shot (Remember when she actually had pigment?)Marie_claire_november_nicole_kidm_2

$37,990: Price of the YSL Downtown Croc Tote, the most expensive item featured in “Shopping Deconstructed” (The article attempts to answer the burning question, “How can a bag cost more than med school?”  We get the how, but we’re still wondering about the why.)

4: Of the seven cars featured in “Primp My Ride,” the number that cost less than the YSL bag (Hence the reason we’re still working on the why.  A bag that costs more than a car?  Is that ever necessary?  Forty grand for a purse is just plain vulgar.)

$20,855: Value of the five ensembles worn by reader Sarah Annibale in “Fashion Boot Camp”

26.8: Percent of the average Marie Claire reader’s household income needed to purchase those same outfits (source: Marie Claire’s media kit, registration required)

$1,385: Retail price of a Versace gold clutch shown in “Clutchy-Feely,” page 64

$650: Price of an Orlane Paris cream containing pure gold extract, as shown in “Beauty Deconstructed”

$797.80: Price of one ounce of gold (source)

5: Pages devoted to the story “Step Away from the Chardonnay!” which is an ever-so-helpful guide to “choosing your booze”

9: Number of pages of Bacardi Rum advertising located immediately adjacent to the aforementioned story (an eight-page insert plus a full-page ad)

2: Pages of alcohol advertising placed elsewhere in the issue

101: Number of readers who appear in for “101 Dresses (on 101 Readers)”

26: Median age of readers depicted in “101 Dresses (on 101 Readers)”

37.1: Median age of Marie Claire readers (source)

$1,320: Average annual per capita income in Bhutan, where fashion spread “A Stitch in Time” was shot (source)

4: Number of items depicted priced greater than $1,320, not including a “price upon request” Maxmara dress

Fashion Mini Celebrates Ten-Year-Old Taste

You know, it’s pretty much par for the course that a magazine has the power to make us feel bad about ourselves.  Between the impossibly skinny models, their never-seen-the-sun skin, and our apparently inadequate earning power, reading a magazine can sometimes turn into a real battle with our self-esteemFashion_mini_september_hideous_plai.  Last night, we were reading the October issue of Marie Claire, feeling pretty good about our bank balance—until we saw that a $295 Tory Burch dress listed as a “steal.”  Suddenly, our mood darkened.  A dress that costs a good deal more than our car payment?  Oh, sure, what a fantastic way to spend our hard-earned dollars!   But was the magazine’s perspective skewed, or are we simply not bringing home enough cash to finance a fashionable life?

Fortunately for our sense of self-worth, the page also suggested a $34.95 H&M dress.  (And we aren’t really in the midst of a magazine-induced personal crisis…yet.)  Still, we have to wonder who Marie Claire thinks is reading their magazine when such disparate price points are both considered bargains, but we’re digressing.

We’ve been reading fashion mags for the better part of our life (really!), which means we’ve absorbed plenty of stories about men, clothes, and money that don’t even approach our reality.  Still, we hadn’t yet read anything that made us feel like we were inadequate in our youth.  Until tonight, that is!  Who even knew that poor self-esteem could be retroactive?  Well, it’s totally possible!  How?  Well, the September Fashion Mini crowns actress Camilla Belle one of their fifty most stylish luminaries.  Then, horrifyingly, the issue confronts us with a detailed account of actress Camilla Belle’s preferences as a ten-year-old—taking us all the way back to 1997. 

Although that was the year we turned twenty-one, Belle’s means—not to mention her taste—were already well beyond our reach.  Reading her style picks, it becomes rather clear that some of us (and we do mean us) will never quite catch up with the magazine world’s favorite tastemakers.  Behind the jump, we compare our picks with Camilla’s, circa 1997.  Looks like we can blame our lack of Louboutins on our childhood!

Continue reading "Fashion Mini Celebrates Ten-Year-Old Taste" »

Scoping Out September Issues: Marie Claire

Marie_claire_september_ashley_olsen

The issue weighs: 1.4 pounds

Issue thickness: an eminently manageable three-eighths of an inch

Who’s on the cover: A surprisingly attractive Ashley Olsen, sporting an indigo Vuitton gown and heavy eyeliner

Why she’s on the cover:  Because she and her sister are launching yet another clothing line, this one called Elizabeth and James, as well as a second collection from The Row.  Which means people are actually buying pricey clothes designed by Mary-Kate and Ashley, which means their Wal-Mart collections were just a launching pad, which means these two are almost certainly going to take over the world.  Brace yourselves.

Who bought the back cover: Emporio Armani Diamonds, with an ad featuring Beyonce.  We have no idea what this stuff smells like, but this ranks as one of the most uninspired ads ever.

Cover line that made us cringe:

Shocking!  Female suicide bombers

Way to make a serious topic sound like tabloid fluff.

Number of ad pages between the cover and the table of contents: a mere 17

Total number of pages: 284

How many of those pages are ads: 168, almost 60 percent

Subscription cards: Our issue had only one, and it was bound.  No pesky flyaways?  Nice.

Cosmetic samples: 3 scent strips—Ralph Lauren Romance, Donna Karan Cashmere Mist, and Sarah Jessica Parker Covet.  Enough!  Our nostrils are on fire.

Is it portable?  Oh, yeah.  This edition is no larger than the average issue of Vogue or InStyle.  We’re ripping out the fragrance strips, though—this thing reeks enough to attract bees.

Newsstand Confession When we picked up the September Marie Claire with Ashley Olsen on the cover, we immediately flipped it over to see if Mary-Kate was on the other side.  Worse, we had a tiny moment of disappointment when we realized she wasn’t.

Masthead

Editor: Wendy Felton


Front of the Book



Back Issues

Search


Subscribe



Powered by FeedBlitz

Glossed Over’s Most-Read Articles

Updating! Stay tuned.


Blog powered by TypePad

Alltop, confirmation that I kick ass