Glamour

Ad in Glamour Creates a Contradictory Message

The November issue of Glamour features an amusing juxtaposition of editorial content and advertising. Glamour_november_keira_knightleyOn page 48, in “Dos, Don’ts, News & Views,” the mag scolds men for checking out their co-stars’ cleavage on the red carpet:

Glamour_november_boob_glance

And inside the back cover, an ad for Vassarette indicates their bra will inspire men to do just that:

Glamour_vassarette_ad

(The text reads, “Hope you’re willing to sacrifice a little eye contact.”)

This particular ad sparked a minor disagreement in my house. Here’s what transpired when my husband spotted my copy of Glamour folded open to that page.

Him: Are you going to write about that ad?

Me: Yes. It bothers me. Like men need any more encouragement to stare at women’s chests?

Him: It’s not directed toward men—it’s a magazine, and an ad, for women. I think it’s kind of funny.

Me: Sure, you find it funny because no one’s ever talked to your breasts instead of your face.

Him: Well, what are bras for? To de-emphasize your cleavage?

So I’d love to hear some other opinions. Readers, what’s up with this ad?

Glamour Undermines Its Under-the-Skin Message

The October edition of Glamour is all about age. You know, it’s the issue where they divide women into incredibly broad and stereotypical categories based on one small facet of our existence and then expect us conform exactly to one of those groups. Glamour_october_age_issue

Oh, wait, that’s every issue.

I’ll start with the upper right hand of the cover:

Love Your Looks

Rachel Bilson, Ali Larter & Diane Lane Tell How

Awesome. There’s nothing I love more than a woman on the cover of a fashion magazine explaining to me how I can learn to appreciate my appearance. The obvious: If I resembled one of those three, I’d have no trouble loving my looks.

So what enlightenment does this trio offer? Let’s check out “Gorgeous at Any Age” to find out!

Rachel Bilson is dubbed “Confident at 27.” Well, wouldn’t you be confident if you could be described the way she is?

She’s already starred in a successful TV series, The O.C., bought a home and launched a brand new fashion line for DKNY Jeans…[To Rachel] You’re a young woman with a successful career at an age when a lot of your peers are starting out. You probably have a little money in the bank and a sense of direction about what’s coming next.

See how easy it is to feel good about yourself? Just star in a TV show and design a clothing line in conjunction with a major apparel label! There is one glimmer of hope here, though: 27 is considered young!

It gets better, though. Next up, Ali Larter, who is “Sexy at 32”! (Sexy, eh? Like women of 32 are typically asexual prunes?) Here’s what she has to say about the purported subject of this section:

I actually think I look better now [than when she was in her twenties] because I feel so much better about myself now. And that’s what’s so exciting. As you get older, you get better…Look at all these incredible women, like Vanessa Redgrave, who are still so beautiful. The reason is because they embrace who they are.

That may be the healthiest, most reasonable attitude about aging ever printed in a women’s magazine.

Finally, there’s the “Red-Hot at 43” Diane Lane, who offers a similarly sensible approach:

...there is something wonderful about coming to terms with time—that it is finite. You want to have as much joy in your life as possible, and you take responsibility for your own joy.

How does Glamour follow up all this talk about surrendering to the inevitable and learning to respect yourself? With two pages full of expert advice, makeup, and skincare products to “work your looks.”  Loving yourself is spectacular, but you’d like yourself even more if you got rid of that frizzy hair and applied some bronzer!

Admittedly, appreciating “the skin you’re in now” involves loving your actual skin. But if self-esteem starts on the inside, as the rest of the article suggests, shouldn’t the advice for developing that go beyond, well, skin deep? I think so, but that’s probably because I haven’t shelled out for the Glamour-endorsed $155 anti-aging cream. Hey, why bother developing inner beauty at all? There's always someone at the cosmetics counter willing to sell it to me in a jar.

I'm Not in Love with Glamour's Relationship Advice

Glamour seems to have confused itself with Cosmopolitan this month. Its “Men, Sex & Love” section is packed with the kinds of things that are usually the purview of its trashier counterpart.

It kicks off with “14 Things He Wants You to Know About His Body,” which includes little-known facts like that men enjoy receiving compliments. Thanks, Glamour, that’s going to revolutionize my relationship. Also, there’s this overstatement from the guys: Glamour_september_penelope_cruz

Prostate exams (nearly) make up for the whole not-giving-birth thing—you’ll see!

Okay, I am the owner of neither a prostate nor a child, but do we really need to base relationship advice on a battle of whose biology has doomed them to more humiliating medical visits? (Also, guys, are you sure you want to turn this into a contest? Prostate exams don’t follow you home and require 18 years of financial support.)

Then there’s this charmingly titled article:

Guys, What Do You Want to Do Sexually That You’ve Never Done Before?

Good thing Glamour’s giving guys space to express their fantasies! Where else would men get to talk about threesomes?

“He Wants You Back” purports to reveal the “sweetly desperate, painfully sad” things men have done while disregarding a woman’s wish to end the relationship. Serenading her in a grocery store is kind of sweet (if you can ignore the stalker-like aspects of following your ex-girlfriend while she shops), but one of these stories veers into downright creepy.

So one night, when I was in South Carolina and she was in Delaware visiting a friend, I decided to proclaim my love to her…When I got there at 4 a.m., the front door was unlocked, so I tiptoed around to find her. [emphasis mine]

Oh, entering someone else’s home in the middle of the night without permission is so romantic! Illegal trespassing is the best way to prove your love and devotion!

Well, all this advice is potentially good for one thing: if I ever wanted to confirm my worst suspicions about men, Glamour’s stories might come in very handy.

What’s the worst love advice you’ve ever read in a magazine?

The Language of Magazines: Is "Curvy" Completely Meaningless?

I should have known the term “curvy” was on the fast track to obsolescence when Marie Claire used the slender-but-busty Katherine Heigl as an exemplar of the body type. What makes a woman curvy? It used to be the word was bestowed upon those lovely women who, nonetheless, were heavier than the Hollywood-lollipop standard. Now? The definition has loosened. It seems any celeb who hasn’t retained Rachel Zoe as her stylist could one day be worthy of the term.

That’s not to say that celebrities—or anyone else—should be shunted into an easily definable body-type box. And fashion magazines should absolutely not be arbiters of what any woman should look like. Even so, is the pressure to be slim increased by expanding the definition of “curvy” to include slender women? Are women with different, heavier bodies being squeezed out by the broader definition of the term that once belonged to them? Does it even matter?

Decide for yourself. Here are three women who’ve recently been dubbed “curvy” by magazines.

Jessica Biel and her “curvy figure” in August’s Bazaar:

Jessica_biel_bazaar_dance_2

Kim Raver has “serious curves” in September’s Glamour:

Kim_raver_glamour

And Anna Faris has a “curvy bod” in the fall edition of InStyle Makeover:

Anna_faris_instyle_makeover

What do you think?

Business as Usual: Blonde Celebs Land September Covers

We’re just a few weeks away from the massive September magazines! That means it’s almost time for the same crop of overexposed celebrities who appear on all the covers to snag yet another one. (Vanity Fair, while not strictly a fashion mag, will feature a handful of models.) Here’s who’ll be gracing, er, appearing:

Vogue: Keira Knightley (and just like last year, I’ll be liveblogging as I read the issue)

Allure: Carrie Underwood

Cosmopolitan: Blake Lively

Elle: Jessica Simpson (who, apparently, was on the cover of Elle’s best-selling issue ever. Ever. How is that even possible?)

Glamour: Penelope Cruz

InStyle: Uma Thurman

W: Kate Hudson

No word yet on which flaxen-haired tabloid fixture will land Marie Claire, Lucky, or Bazaar.

Infomania's "We've Got You Covered" May Render Reading Obsolete

Wish you had the time and money to read everything at the newsstand, but worried about your blood pressure? Me too! That’s just one of the reasons I love the Current network’s show Infomania and the segment “We’ve Got You Covered,” which provides a snappy summary of the latest in periodicals. This week’s edition features Glamour, Vogue, Lucky, some other magazines I often buy but rarely read, and, um, a slime mold.

Head to Current’s site to watch Infomania in its entirety.

Lowest Common Denominator: Glamour, August

47: Number of items promised on the front cover by number

Not much: What Glamour thinks of its readers, considering the cover lines’ emphasis on “cheap,” “easy,” “lazy,” and “shortcuts”

8: Percent of women surveyed by Glamour who say going to work bra-less is a “do” Glamour_august_christina_aguiler_2

$1,000,000: Money Drew Barrymore donated for relief in Africa, as cited in “Drew’s Million-Dollar Miracle”

20,000: Children that money will feed for a year, based on the article’s statement that $50 feeds one child for twelve months

$1,267: Total retail value of the featured cosmetics in the Beauty section immediately following the piece about Barrymore

18: Number of “real women” depicted in the “Jeans Special” section

8: Of 10, the number of real women considered “don’ts” in “The Official Dos and Don’ts of Denim”

1: Page devoted to “I Could Be Killed for Helping This Woman,” about a volunteer who works illegally in Myanmar providing aid to cyclone victims

3: Pages devoted to Christina Aguilera, not including the cover

975,301: Approximate number of times I’ve read how a celebrity got back into shape after childbirth in a women’s magazine, now that I’ve read the Xtina interview

975, 301: Approximate number of those articles containing clichés about motherhood (“My little boy breathes new life into me…Of course you have compassion for children, but when you have your own, you feel it on a much deeper level…Our child comes first, obviously…”)

10: Pages of “Fall Clothes You Can Wear Now,” including a full-length coat, a long-sleeved black lace dress, and several pairs of opaque tights

82: Forecasted high temperature, in degrees, for my city on Monday, July 14

11: Number of Olympic athletes featured in “The 11 Greatest Bodies on Earth”

Not a one: Models in this issue whose shapes look remotely like these “greatest bodies”

Minuscule: Amount of belief I have that Glamour’s praise for the Olympians’ bodies will eventually translate into a wider range of models in the fashion spreads (Don’t get me wrong. I want it to happen very much; I’m just a cynic.)

100: Percent of clothes in “The New Rules of Casual Chic” that come from the Gap

Nada: Gap items featured elsewhere in the issue

Magazines Acknowledge The Cost of Clothes: A Recession Fashion Rundown

So, the U.S. is teetering on the brink of a recession. While there is a smattering of financial advice scattered throughout the July issues, the magazines focus on something far more important than investments and job security: looking good! Priorities! The best investment to weather an economic crisis is, apparently, your wardrobe. I’m no financial expert, but based on what’s in the magazines this month, I will say this: If Forever 21 ever goes public, buy.

Nearly all the magazines offer looks at lower prices, but considering the source, lower-priced is not necessarily low-end. Here’s a breakdown of the style sticker shock:

Bazaar

One page of “Hottest, Newest, Latest” is devoted to “fashion at AFFORDABLE prices.” It was wise to emphasize the word “affordable,” because otherwise—well, see for yourself.

Total number of deals: 6

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $69 Banana Republic scarf

Most expensive bargain: A $395 Elie Tahari clutch

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $140 J. Crew flats

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $450,000 Neil Lane for De Beers bracelet

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: A $46,650 Balenciaga dress. No, it isn’t woven from gold. Why do you ask?


Cosmopolitan

“How to Shop Summer Sales” blends fashion with suggestions to befriend a saleswoman and keep your receipts for price adjustments. Original!

Total number of deals: 14

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $49 dress from Macy’s

Most expensive bargain: A $158 necklace, Marc by Marc Jacobs

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $48 DKNY jeans

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $575 3.1 Philip Lim dress

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Cosmo neglects to list prices for the most expensive items, like the YSL cardigan worn by a model riding a jetski. Where else would you wear such a sweater?

Elle_july_marykate_olsen_2

Elle

An eight-page spread, “Le Cheap, C’est Chic!,” is annoyingly teased on the cover with the line “No She Didn’t!” Because, you know, spending less than $150 on an item of clothing is totally a novel lifestyle choice and not a necessity!

Total number of deals: Who can tell what Elle thinks is “cheap”? They’ve got Forever 21 mixed with Burberry.

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $6 bead necklace and, the fashion find of the century, a $7 Hanes t-shirt. Thanks for uncovering that hidden gem, Elle!

Most expensive bargain: Elle’s “inexpensive” clothes are paired with thousands of dollars of jewelry, as if that’s the only way to redeem them. The highest-priced piece in “Le Cheap” is a $3,990 diamond ring.

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $48 Levi’s denim shorts worn by Mary-Kate Olsen

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $5,600 Marchesa satin dress

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Ludicrous $300 square sunglasses by Luella by Linda Farrow. People aren’t actually going to buy those, right? Right?


Glamour

Bargains are splashed across one page, “Summery work stuff—all less than $40,” and a high-low feature, “Your Summer Extras.”

Total number of deals: 12 for sure; the high-low feature doesn’t designate what is what. A $40 scarf could go either way.

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $10 Shop Suey ring

Most expensive bargain: A $70 Roberta Freymann tote (assuming this is what counts for low-end in Glamour’s universe. Since another page in the same story features a $795 straw hat, I think it must.)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $25 Chinese Laundry belt

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: The $12,000 Louis Vuitton Speedy mentioned here

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Gotta be that hat.


InStyle

An anemic single page is devoted to “Deals & Steals.”

Total number of deals: 7

Their idea of dirt cheap: $14 aviator sunglasses by Shop Suey

Most expensive bargain: A $139 MNG by Mango dress

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $18 American Apparel t-shirt

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $88,000 Van Cleef and Arpels ring

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: An $18,000 Donna Karan crocodile bag. It’s just a purse.


Lucky

An entire feature, “The Season’s Best Looks Under $100,” is given over to low-price style.

Total number of deals: 67

Their idea of dirt cheap: An $18 Mossimo for Target top

Most expensive bargain: Tie: at $99, a “tiered maxiskirt” by WDNY International and a Tommy Hilfiger cotton dress

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $7 Metro 7 tank top

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $1,465 bracelet by Steven Dweck

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Chanel charges $1,225 for a belt. A belt! I regret not launching a career in luxury fashion.


Marie Claire

They’ve spread the discounts throughout: there’s one page of “101 Ideas,” one page of “Splurge vs. Steal,” and a feature, “Black & White,” that’s high-low.

Total number of deals: 40

Their idea of dirt cheap: $7 Hue socks (Thanks, Marie Claire, I was really overspending on socks.)

Most expensive bargain: $300 Marciano shoes (worn with the $7 Hue socks, natch)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: $5.80 Forever 21 sunglasses

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: An $18,800 Cartier ring

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: A Chanel top and skirt set that retails for the low, low price of $10,745.


Self

Looks like all the clothes shown in the  fashion features under $100, which is excellent.

Total number of deals: 100, according to the cover

Their idea of dirt cheap: It’s a tie at $8 for a Forever 21 necklace and Old Navy earrings

Most expensive bargain: Another tie, this one at $99, for a Nahui Ollin tote, an RJ Graziano necklace, and a $99 Tommy Hilfiger clutch. Those are special prices for Self readers, however, so this hews dangerously close to cheating.

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: See above for $8 jewelry.

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: That tank top Anne Hathaway is wearing on the cover? Yeah. It’s $845, and she’s wearing it with necklaces whose combined total is $5,300.

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: $49 jelly shoes, but probably only because I’m old enough to remember buying jellies the first time around.

Vogue_july_nicole_kidman_2

Vogue

In “The Economists,” Vogue editors offer “inspired finds under $500 (plus one key investment piece).” Oh, thank god, because I needed help to find clothes that cost so little.

Total number of deals: 31, not counting the home décor and investment pieces

Their idea of dirt cheap: A $127 Sykes London belt

Most expensive bargain: Seven items retail for $495, including a John Varvatos coat, a Moschino Cheap and Chic skirt, and a  3.1 Philip Lim dress. (You didn’t think they’d go four whole pages without mentioning Lim, did you?)

Cheapest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $150 YSL dickey

Priciest item elsewhere in the magazine: A $16,600 Cartier watch

Item whose price makes me question the wisdom of capitalism: Hands down, the dickeys were the most egregiously priced items I saw in any of the magazines. Vogue featured two: a $150 YSL version and a $395 Prada one. That’s an awful lot of scratch for something that isn’t even a real shirt.

Glamour Takes On Gossip Girl's Prohibitive Purse Prices

The July edition of Glamour’s “Dos, Don’ts, News & Views” compares the accessories of TV characters. Deeming a Jimmy Choo bag acceptable for a thirty-something denizen of Lipstick Jungle, the mag goes on to declare a Constance Billard freshman’s $2,495 Valentino tote unrealistically expensive for someone so young.

Glamour_july_dos_and_donts_2

Oddly, Glamour failed to indicate which age group is permitted to carry the $12,000 Louis Vuitton Speedy bag pictured in “Sunny Day Chic” on page 144 (below). $12K for a bag to take to the beach, and they think Gossip Girl is unbelievable?

Glamour_july_lv_speedy_2

Lowest Common Denominator: Glamour, November

1: Celebrity slam on the cover (“Mariah’s new attitude: she’s smarter and saner—Britney, take notes!”  Oooh, burn.)

5: Musicians whose onstage facial expressions are analyzed as their “sex faces”Glamour_november_mariah_carey

One million:  Approximate number of other magazines and websites where we’ve seen this exact same discussion (Related:  why is it always John Mayer in these stories?)

116: Page which contains the sentence “The pleats flatter too.”  What?   

118: Page on which Glamour advises, “Pleats add volume to your hip and belly area.  Our advice?  Just skip ‘em.”

6: Traits that “make a guy ask you out,” according to dating columnist Jake

10: Anecdotes about women being dumped in “You think you got dumped?”

$456: Average cost of rent, in dollars, for a young single woman (page 204)

1995: Last time our rent was anywhere near that low (No, really, where are these $456 rents?)

1: Pages devoted to an interview with former Pakistan prime minister Benazir Bhutto

7: Pages devoted to Mariah Carey’s home (including a full-page photo of Mariah with her mind-bogglingly vast collection of Hello Kitty paraphernalia)

21: Number of ads for fragrance in this issue

4: pages allotted to “One Spritz and You’re Sexy,” which is about—you guessed it—perfume

Masthead

Editor: Wendy Felton


Front of the Book



Back Issues

Search


Subscribe



Powered by FeedBlitz

Glossed Over’s Most-Read Articles

Updating! Stay tuned.


Blog powered by TypePad

Alltop, confirmation that I kick ass