Anna Wintour

To-Do List • Attempting to walk in Lucky’s shoes? Deadline’s approaching! The cut-off to enter the magazine’s caption-writing contest is Monday, March 3, at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.

And if you’re looking for reading material beyond the new issue of Vogue (what is up with Drew Barrymore on the cover?), these stories have captured our attention this week:

• Anna Wintour responds to Carine Roitfeld calling her a “puppet” by refusing to comment, thereby crushing our hopes for an all-out intercontinental war between the Vogue editors.

• Take a glimpse at the past—and the present, and, we fear, the future—of women’s magazines. (Thanks, Melinika!)

InStyle mixes up the non-Beyoncé members of Destiny’s Child.

• And are Holocaust memorials wildly inappropriate locales for fashion shoots? One brand, facing backlash from shots of a male model at the Vienna monument, admits they “didn’t think through everything.” Well, that much is clear. (via SuperColossal)

A Glossed Over Guide: How to Be Carine Roitfeld, Editor of French Vogue

Carine Roitfeld, the editor of French Vogue, is the subject of a profile in the current issue of New York magazine. The article by Amy Larocca radiates a staggering amount of antipathy—perhaps best exemplified by the choice to recreate Roitfeld’s Gallic accent and broken English verbatim. (Actual quote: “I have in my office—what you call in America?”)

Perhaps because we’re so accustomed to the sickly sweet world of fashion magazine profiles, where everybody loves everybody else, we were thrilled to see an actual, honest-to-goodness point of view. Whether we agree with Larocca’s take is almost irrelevant; we learned so much from this profile. Roitfeld may be near  universally revered as an arbiter of chic, but many of her secrets were laid bare. What did we learn about navigating the tricky path to becoming a top magazine editor?

Carine_roitfeld_4

1. Portray yourself in the best possible light. Literally.

She is a fiftyish woman having a double espresso in the lobby of the Carlyle on Madison Avenue. “For me, it is best to be the youngest in hotel,” she explains, “and I was not having this feeling at the Mercer.” She has come to New York for her son Vladimir’s 23rd birthday, which she celebrated the night before with dinner at Indochine. “It makes me happy because there is vewy great lighting,” she says about the restaurant. “Vewy flatter.” (Roitfeld has reached a compromise with the hard American r by converting them all to ws.)

2. Believe in yourself, regardless of immaterial details like training or education.

“Some editors, they have that, they know all the designer from the beginning of the nineteenth century. They know this is triple cashmere, this is simple cashmere. Maybe they went to fashion school. Me, I don’t. I just get a feeling about what is exciting. It is all just from feeling. So I don’t know”—she pulls her lips into a pout and gives one of those poufy little French exhales—“I think maybe I have a talent.”

3. Do everything you can to keep fashion the exclusive province of the wealthy and slender.

Because of this, Roitfeld’s French Vogue is the polar opposite of most American fashion magazines. It is unconcerned with making fashion wearable or accessible to its readers. It is not inclusive: There is no advice on how to dress if you’re shaped like a pear or about to turn 50.

In Roitfeld’s world, models are never too skinny, diamonds are never too expensive.

4. Lob passive-aggressive insults at more influential editors. (Excellent! We’ve got a head start on mastering this one.)

“The American editors are very, how you say, slick,” Roitfeld says. “Very perfect. Hair is perfect, they have a manicure. They are very clean, they follow fashion. I don’t think they take many risks. They do the total look of Prada. Me, I wear a lot of Japanese piece mixed with a bit of classic Hermès and Prada. Even though jeans suit me, I never wear jeans.”…

“It’s very difficult not to become a puppet,” she says of it all. “Like Anna, she becomes so iconic that she becomes like a puppet. I don’t want to be like that, I don’t want to wear this uniform, I don’t want to be just an envelope.”

Roitfeld styled a shoot last year in homage to Wintour’s look, puppetlike or not, starring a model with a bob, dark sunglasses, and many a fur coat. (“PETA, they like to pay attention to her, not to me,” she says, “so this is good for me.”)

5. Bite the hand that feeds you.

In an industry where accessories count for the bulk of her advertisers’ revenue, she has this to say: “Right now I think that fashion in the world becomes a bit boring. There is so much money, and I feel a bit when you go to shows they want to sell so many handbags, and for me, well, I do not like handbags. I do not wear handbags. It is not a nice look, to carry a handbag.”

6. Look for the good in everyone!

“…So people always say that I weigh my staff, and it is totally wrong. All my girls are very skinny and very chic and very beautiful. And if they are not beautiful, well, then they are very charming. So people always say that I weigh them, but no. I don’t weigh my girls.”

7. Know what tools are essential for doing your job well.

Her desk is nearly empty—Roitfeld does not know how to use a computer—save for a telephone, a pair of black suede gloves, some color printouts of a fashion shoot, and a tiny snakeskin clutch.

8. Have an open mind about other cultures!

Roitfeld is 48 hours off a ten-day vacation in Thailand during which she worked a great deal on meditation.

How was this trip?

“You think this will be so glamorous,” she sighs. “You have the idea in your mind and then you get there and the people in the hotel …” She grimaces and gestures hugely in the hip area. “There were lots of people who were so fat and like that.”

Well, we hope they were at least charming!

More Glossed Over Guides: Parlaying Your Pregnancy Into Press; Becoming a Big-Time Beauty Editor

“I think Anna is a terrific lady” • Lloyd Grove recently interviewed designer Elie Tahari for Portfolio.com, and the two discussed everything from Israel to fashion shows to Angelina Jolie. Representative of the crackling exchanges in the Q & A:

L.G.: But didn’t you used to go to Studio 54?

E.T.: Yeah.

L.G.: Did you have trouble meeting women? I’m sorry for you.

E.T.: Um, no, I’ve been lucky. I was good-looking when I was young. [Laughs.]

“I’m sorry for you”?  Such a rarely used phrase in journalism!

Anyway, the whole thing gets really vague when Tahari sort of discusses having breakfast with Anna Wintour for the first time, why Tahari designs haven’t been featured in Vogue until recently, and how the whole situation is “a bit sensitive to talk about—between me and my wife.”  Juicy!  Anna Wintour causing marital discord? Sadly, Grove doesn’t probe Tahari (who comes across as quite reticent to discuss the matter) on that point, but we did enjoy this exchange about the editor-in-chief:

L.G.: What is it with you? I saw a quote where somebody was pointing out that Vogue had pretty much ignored you, and you said, "I guess I’m not important enough for Vogue."
 
E.T.: No, no. Well, that quote was taken out of context. But look, I think Anna is a terrific lady, and I—

L.G.:
Yada yada yada. I understand.

Read the whole interview here.

Live Blog: Reading September's Vogue

Here goes nothing something, we hope. We’ve never live blogged before, and to our knowledge, no one else has live blogged a magazine before. There may be a reason for that. Guess we’€™ll find out! We should mention that we have not even opened the September issue of Vogue until now, nor have we read other blogs’ takes on the issue. We have no idea what to expect and only the most optimistic of hopes that we’ll be done before Conan O’Brien starts.

Vogue_september_sienna_miller

8:04 p.m.: Sienna’€™s eyebrows are the exact same thickness as Gwyneth’€™s are on the cover of W.  Guess we’€™re all supposed to break out the eyebrow pencil this fall.

8:05 p.m.: The cover says the issue is

Extra-extra large!  Our biggest issue ever

Which really means more ads than ever before.  Less to read, more for Vogue to tout!  Great!  Okay, enough with the cover...now we’re actually going to open the magazine.

8:08 p.m.: Serious lust for the Gucci jacket and gloves in the ad about a dozen pages in.

8:10 p.m.: Next ad spread is Hilary Rhoda for Estee Lauder.  Is she the one who kicked off the thick brow craze?  Confidential to Sienna:  Hilary’s look good because they’€™re natural.  And next, more of the Yves Saint Laurent ads with Gisele.  Love the right-hand page shot of Gisele from the waist down...we would hang that on the wall, poster-size.

8:12 p.m.: Cavalcade of celebs!  Kate Winslet for Tresor, six pages of Angelina Jolie for St. John, Halle Berry for Revlon.

8:13 p.m.: Four Prada pages with strange black plastic-looking...things.  We don’€™t get it.  Someone explain?

8:15 p.m.: We’€™ve arrived at the table of contents, page 54.

8:19 p.m.: So if Kate Moss looks like Grover from Sesame Street in that fluffy electric blue Versace coat, how will any mere mortals wear the thing?  We like the strapless dress with the opaque black tights, though.  Yes, we’™re in the middle of another 50 pages of ads and still haven’t hit the rest of the table of contents.

8:22 p.m.: Jordache is advertising?  Really?  Also, after three kids in short succession, if Heidi Klum’s actual body looks remotely like it does in this ad (besides the Barbie-like lack of nipple), we were gypped in the genetic lottery.  Sigh.  When does Project Runway come back?

8:26 p.m.: Look!  More contents!  Page 96.  Do you read the table of contents except to find a specific  article?  We usually don’€™t bother lest the descriptions actually convince us not to read something.  Like the article by Plum Sykes in this issue, which we’€™ll totally read because we hate her, but listen to the way it’€™s listed here:

Plum Sykes tackles brooches big and small in search of one that sticks

See?  We’re turned off for reasons that have nothing to do with our rampant dislike of Plum.  (Note to self:  Find out if that is, in fact, her real first name.)

8:31 p.m.: The power in our apartment just went out for no apparent reason.  We had to stop blogging to play with circuit breakers!  At least something happened...we were starting to get bored by the endless ads--Calvin Klein, Michael Kors, Bulova.  Blah.

8:38 p.m.: Soooo many ads.  Still.  The same Molly Sims Cover Girl ad we’ve been seeing for months.  Valentino’s Rock ’€™n Rose--a model covering her breasts with flower petals!  How very cutting-edge.  We’re just flipping through now in an apparently vain search for content.

8:41 p.m.:  Hey, look!  More contents on page 146!  According to "Cover Look," Sienna is wearing a cream ostrich-plume dress by Marchesa.  Would you believe we were so captivated by her brows that we didn’t even notice the feathers?  Clearly, our powers of observation need some work.

8:44 p.m.: Dillard’€™s bought eight pages of ads and the only notable thing about them is the dog.  Cute pup!

8:46 p.m.: Okay, this Taryn Rose ad?  New heights of ridiculousness.  The model is wearing a short, low-cut dress with a fur stole and leopard-print heels.  Not so weird...except that she’€™s apparently standing outside a medieval cottage with a wooden door pruning her garden.  (No, that’s not a metaphor--she’s holding a pair of clippers in one pink rubber glove-clad hand and a long-stemmed bud in the other.)  Also?  Not a single flower on any of the plants in the photo.  Ads that make no sense make us wince.  We’€™re idealists.

8:50 p.m.: Guess what?  More ads for crap we can’€™t afford!

8:51 p.m.: Teri Hatcher in lingerie for Badgley Mischka.  The good: There’s actually a tiny crease in the flesh of her bare stomach, as if she’€™s at a normal body weight.  (Ha!)  The bad:  Her face looks more youthful than when she was on Lois and Clark.

8:55 p.m.: Another page of contents, though we’re pretty sure by now this issue contains nothing but more tables of contents and ads.  Lots and lots of ads.

8:57 p.m.: An ad for Sarah Jessica Parker’s Covet.  Just go away already.  We are not interested in a perfume that will supposedly compel us to COMMIT A CRIME and break a window in order to snatch the basketball-sized bottle of chartreuse liquid.  Still better than the TV commercials for the stuff, though.

9:01 p.m.: Christy Turlington!  A supermodel!  How very novel.

9:02 p.m.: Hey, Gap, we see Selma Blair and Lucy Liu featured in your current campaign.  They’€™re lovely people, we’€™re sure, but is that the best you can do?  If you were trying to land hip and relevant actresses for your ads, you’re a few years behind with those two.  Also, why did you destroy any charm Sarah Silverman might have had?  She looks like a malformed emo Annie Hall in this picture!

9:05 p.m.: Editor’s letter, page 208...interrupted by fifteen more pages of ads.  Sorry, Anna, what were you saying?  Making the September issue is like making a movie?

9:08 p.m.: We spoke too soon--twenty more pages of ads, including a repeat of an ad for ShopVogue.com.  How many times will that one pop up, we wonder?

9:13 p.m.: Anna Wintour says that Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez, the designers behind Proenza Schouler, “live a very downtown and bohemian life.” So $375 tanks are what pass for “bohemian” in Wintour’s world.  Yikes.   

9:13 p.m.: Sienna Miller looks far better in the ads for Tod's than she does on the cover.  Dare we say, with these photos, we almost understand the hype.

9:15 p.m.: Tony Blair is on the cover of Men’s Vogue.  So if you want to appear on a magazine cover, you only have to be young and good-looking if you’re a woman!  Sure, Blair’€™s got plenty to talk about...but so does, say, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and we don’€™t expect to see her on a fashion mag any time soon.  Or ever, really.

9:22 p.m.: Ad for Ports 1961. “€œOtherworldly”€ is the kindest way we can describe this look.  A sad contrast to the Lily Cole for Bloomingdale’€™s spread immediately preceding this.

9:25 p.m.: Stretch!

9:25 p.m.: Ad for Le Mystere No. 9, the bra for women with breast implants.  No, really.

9:27 p.m.: Six pages promoting fur!  Hope Anna Wintour’s prepared to get another cream pie in the face at the Paris shows this fall.  The ad calls fur “the natural, responsible choice”--natural, sure, but responsible?  How’s that?  Is the use of fur somehow keeping the tragic overpopulation of minks in check?

9:39 p.m.: Time for “Life with Andre”!

9:44 p.m.: We aren’t the most fashion-savvy person by any means, but we still hate when we’re confused by Talley’s fashion references.  He’s like the couture version of Dennis Miller.  Like this:

Back on the thirty-seventh floor, what her corduroy coat was to her elegant Schiaparelli side, the fire-engine maxi, worn over a bird-of-paradise black evening column and accessorized with a black leather visor right out of The Wild One with Marlon Brando, shows her fresh Claire McCardell side.

We’re guessing he doesn’t subscribe to the belief that high fashion should be accessible to everyone.

9:51 p.m.:  Um, our power just went off again.  Not fun this time!

9:52 p.m.: A Valentino ad between pages of “Life with Andre.”  The slicked-back hair and red lips are very 80's Robert Palmer video.

9:57 p.m.: Okay, shameful confession time.  We started to read “The Gift,” an article about Nabokov, but then we looked at the clock and realized we’d never finish it before The Hills begins.  Some priorities we have.

10:01 p.m.: Audrina’s going out with that freak JustinBobby again?  Nabokov can wait.  Yes, we are filled with an appropriate amount of self-loathing.

10:05 p.m.: Gwen Stefani looks hot in the ad for L.A.M.B. perfume, even if the stuff does smell an awful lot like Clinique’s Happy.  Bonus points for affixing the ad and sample with an adhesive strip so it’s easy to remove.

10:07 p.m.: The ad for Payless shoes includes the word “bootine.”  Please, please tell us that is not a real word.  We’re making a stand right now—we will fight to prevent that word from entering the vernacular.  “Bootine”?  That’s just stupid.  Even “bootlet” would be way better, assuming we need to start inventing words for every possible permutation of shoe.  Which we don’t.

10:11 p.m.: Note on The Hills:  We are so, so glad we are no longer 21 and single in L.A.  We wouldn’t go back if you paid us in free magazines for life.

10:12 p.m.: According to their ad, Lord & Taylor sells the perfect clothes for playing croquet on the lawn of your mansion with kids dressed in breastplates and doublets.  Great!  We were looking for exactly the right outfit for our next event!

10:17 p.m.: We’re pretty sure we’ll never actually wear teal, yellow, and purple together, but that Kate Spade ad makes the color combo look incredible.  We want those red knee socks something bad.

10:23 p.m.: Another reason we can’t abide Plum Sykes.  On the “Contributors” page, she says she’s most looking forward to the onset of fall because she plans on 

“Getting Michael Kors’s uberchic little black minisuit and wearing it to lunch as soon as Labor Day is over”

Is she the only person on earth still adhering to the rules about which colors you can wear in which months?  Or at least the youngest person alive who won’t wear black in the summer?

10:29 p.m.: Rebecca Romijn’s face looks like a doll’s in the ad for Bebe, and not in a good way.

10:33 p.m.: Best part of the “Letters from Readers” about the Keira Knightley-and-elephant photo shoot from June?  This sentence:

Twelve of us, plus guide, braved the elements to camp in the Kalahari and Moremi Game Reserves, often besieged by hyenas, elephants, and rampaging hippos—not to mention a killer lion or two.

Wait, these people were trekking in the wild, and the animals were besieging them?  Come on!

10:45 p.m.: Taking a quick break, be right back.

11:15 p.m.:  We’ve returned.  Checking out “The Magic Touch.”

11:29 p.m.: Still strangely fascinated by “The Magic Touch,” chronicling a woman’s journey to India where she performs therapeutic massage on leprosy patients.

11:31 p.m.:  Did we say Sienna Miller’s brows were thick?  They’re nothing compared to the model in the Vera Wang ad.  Wow…just…wow.  We have no words.

11:36 p.m.: Just finished the story.  Guess how it ends?  Surprise!  The Western woman goes to help the needy, but they end up helping her change!  Oops, sorry for the spoiler!  Also, there’s this:

I could face almost anything—even India’s crazed rickshaw drivers, waiting just beyond the village gates.

That’s the worst thing she has to face?  Rickshaw drivers are the terrible fate she’s been dealt?

11:43 p.m.:  Jenny Lewis of Rilo Kiley in “Talking Fashion.”  Considering the rest of page 422 features the usual suspects—Katie Holmes, Kirsten Dunst, Cate Blanchett—this is a good thing, even if Jenny’s minidress is horrid.

11:47 p.m.:  William Norwich attends a party thrown by Jessica Seinfeld.  This can’t possibly be interesting or relevant.  On to the next story!

11:49 p.m.:  So we skip the gratuitous society party story, and what do we get?  An endless ad for Juicy and the same ShopVogue.com ad we’ve already seen twice!  It’s like the magazine knew we were skipping something and decided to punish us for it!

11:51 p.m.:  More Vera Wang ad pages, these ones dedicated to her line for Kohl’s.  We’re pleased to report that these pics feature utterly normal eyebrows, meaning Wang has her finger firmly on the pulse of…well…wherever there are Kohl’s stores.  (Though we doubt the ultra-thick eyebrows are going to fly anywhere outside of fashion circles.) 

11:54 p.m.: Stephanie Seymour! 

12:12 a.m.: Oh, the folly of this description!

Your more simplified life is in your hands.  YSL bag, $1,895.

Sure, it’s a great-looking bag, but how would it simplify our lives?  By depleting every single red cent from our bank account.  Life would be rather simple if we owned nothing but a fabulous bag!

12:17 a.m.:  This may be attributable to the fact that it’s late, but we just cannot stay focused on an article about “the fear of chic.”  (That would be “Dare to Wear” on page 461.)  Our lack of interest may also be due to the fact that it’s a fundamentally ridiculous idea.

12:22 a.m.:  From “The Sloppy Syndrome”:

Writer Anne Stringfield, who often attends events in Zac Posen, Dolce & Gabbana, and Giambattista Valli, has been known to toss a cardigan or a jean jacket over her dresses, or wear her glasses to “kind of undermine” the look.

We wear glasses everyday.  And often, cardigans, since the air conditioning in our office is set at a temperature that could keep dairy products fresh.  Guess we’re undermining our own look completely unintentionally!  Reading Vogue is always such an eye-opening experience.  What insight will it bring us next?  Ooh, nail-biter!

12:29 a.m.: Is it completely immature that this made us laugh out loud?  From “Sweet Reverie” on page 486:

“I dreamed of a pair of gold earrings with hot-pink rubies and yellow sapphires,” she [jewelry designer SatBir Kaur Khalsa] says.  “I’ve never woken up in the middle of the night with such passion.”

12:31 a.m.:  We are going to have nightmares about the Lanvin ad (similar to these)--if we ever finish reading this damn magazine and get to sleep, that is.

12:34 a.m.:  You know how lingerie ads usually feature women lounging around their homes in a matching, ornate bra and panty?  Well, La Perla’s ad has a woman lounging around her DECREPIT WOODEN ROWBOAT in an intricate set.  At last, a realistic depiction of how we women wear our fancy lingerie!

12:39 a.m.:  Article about Rainer Werner Fassbinder.  We have no idea.

12:41 a.m.: From “Ask Mrs. Exeter”:

First Nan Kempner and then Pat Buckley; our most fearless national exemplars of taste have been disappearing at an alarming rate…

Which is funny, because this page is adjacent to an ad for Dockers; and sad, because by “disappearing,” the author actually means these women have died.

12:44 a.m.: Dear Tumi, about those yellow bags featured in your ad?  Yes, please!  We’ll take one of each.

12:46 a.m.:  Back to Mrs. Exeter.  The question asks for advice for women of “a certain age,” and Mrs. Exeter replies:

I discussed your letter with some best-dressed arbiters over 30…

Is over 30 synonymous with “of a certain age”?  We know the fashion industry has a skewed view of aging, but that’s ridiculous.

12:50 a.m.:  No one’s actually going to buy the fringed, feathery dresses in the Nina Ricci ad, right?  Right?  We have a sneaking suspicion that someone’s going to show up at the Emmys in the white one, which looks like an old blanket that went through a shredder.

12:52 a.m.:  More Vera Wang.  How many collections does she have, anyway?  Average-size brows in this one, too.

12:54 a.m.:  And we thought we’d be done by now.  We have 300 pages to go.  Sob.

1:01 a.m.:  Andre Leon Talley’s tribute to Gianfranco Ferre was almost moderate…until this paragraph:

I spent many a night with him in Milan, too, previewing his collections—a rare thing because he was not prone to let people into his inner sanctum of design or his private life.  We shared risotto meals in the best restaurants, along with his favorite cousin and former public-relations director, Rita Araghi.  And it was his generosity that often led to a madcap spree.  After his shows, he would allow the supermodels Naomi Campbell and Linda Evangelista and his favorite editors, including yours truly, to hitch a ride back to Paris on the corporate jet.

It was expecting too much that Talley could get through an entire article without a touch of self-aggrandizement, wasn’t it?  Sheesh.  Not even the dead escape!

1:05 a.m.:  A Dior promotion featuring “New York socialites and style mavens” Tinsley Mortimer and Ferebee Bishop.  Oh, good, they needed more exposure.

1:28 a.m.: Plum Sykes, at last we meet again.

1:52 a.m.:  It’s taking forever to get through this Plum Sykes thing.  Probably because we’re exhausted and we keep having to go back and re-read, and also because it won’t end.  This must be the world’s longest article ever about, of all things, brooches.  Of course, it’s also about, of all things, Plum Sykes. 

The trouble is, pin-wearing is alien to me; the last person I knew who wore them on a daily basis was my grandmother Madeleine.

Trouble indeed!  Why not take two and a half pages to figure out how to put a pin on a dress?

1:54 a.m.:  The exciting conclusion?  She successfully wears brooches in public.  Let the ticker-tape parade begin.

1:58 a.m.: And now an essay about gloves?  That’s it.  We refuse.

2:00 a.m.:  Handbags too?  And scarves?  Is anyone’s life really so settled that they have to work out their issues with accessories?

2:02 a.m.:  After all that navel-gazing about accessories (which, you know, we didn’t even bother to read), we are thrilled to find a piece about textile technology.  This may be the best article ever.

2:04 a.m.:  Six hours in and hundreds of pages left to go, and we haven’t even read all the articles.  We can’t decide if we hate ourselves or Vogue more.

2:14 a.m.:  Is it bad that we’re finding YouTube more compelling than Vogue at this point?  At least watching the thousandth spoof of “Chocolate Rain” isn’t putting us to sleep.  Uh…textiles…right.

2:17 a.m.:  Forget fabrics.  We’re going to gaze upon these red T-straps by Ecco for a few moments.  Where can we buy these shoes?  ShopVogue.com!  Well, that worked out nicely for everyone, didn’t it?

2:20 a.m.:  We’re no longer sure what we meant by that comment three minutes ago.  We remember the shoes, though, even in our sleep-deprivation-induced delerium.  Shoes pretty…Oooh…

2:22 a.m.:  The model in the Jean Paul Gaultier ad is wearing four different plaids and some sort of logo on her chin.  We’re pretty sure he doesn’t actually intend for anyone to dress like this in public. 

2:25 a.m.:  We just skipped the movie reviews entirely.  But then, we usually do.

2:29 a.m.:  Yeah, we’re skipping a lot at this point.  Even when the issues aren’t 840 pages long, we normally reach a point in a magazine where we simply lose interest and start flipping, even when we reach an article we’re interested in.  We suspect it’s because we always read magazines from front to back and never go directly to specific pieces we want to read.

2:31 a.m.:  Has anyone ever fallen asleep at the computer while blogging?  How’d that work out for you?

2:42 a.m.: Flipped ahead a few more pages and voila!  Another piece written by Plum Sykes, this time about a hairstylist’s “private Manhattan atelier.”  Sounds swank.  We’re guessing Plum is going to have some sort of struggle with her appearance, but she’ll eventually overcome it after discussing it at length in minute detail.

2:53 a.m.:  All right.  We’re waving the white flag.  Uncle.  We surrender.  Vogue, you win.  You are just too massive.  We’ve been overpowered by your size.  We said we were going straight through to the end, but that will only happen now if we can type and read with our forehead on the keyboard and our eyes firmly shut.

For the record, we made it to page 660.  It only took seven hours (less with breaks) and four cans of Diet Dr. Pepper Berries and Cream.  Now, if you’ll excuse us, we’re going to bed.  But don’t get too comfortable, Vogue—we’ll be back to finish the job.

What Do You Call Ten Models on the Cover of Vogue?

Vogue_may_highres_3

With a whopping ten models on May’s striking foldout cover, it’s as if Anna’s trying to atone for a whole year of subpar celebrity covers (like, say, the Nicole Kidman hair debacle or Jennifer Hudson’s strangely protruding collarbone).  Either that, or no model will appear the cover again until 2010.  Which scenario do you find more likely?

[High-res scan from Confessions of a Casting Director via Oh No They Didn’t]

The Week: Simple-Minded Simple Life Stars Land Bazaar Cover

• First, a bit of Glossed Over news.  We’d love to hear more like this.  Got dirt?  Email us. Also, we’ve added Twitter to our front page for quick updates. Anna_wintour_vs_peta_3

•  Hankering for more thinly veiled, poorly written “fiction” about a spunky editor being deposed from her eponymous magazine?  Gawker’s got another installment.  Or hear the actual story from Jane Pratt next Friday.

•  Anna Wintour hates the word “blog” and has ordered her staff to come up with a replacement immediately. 

•  W, Glamour, and Vogue were nominated for National Magazine Awards.  We aren’t sure why either.

•  And in case you needed another reason not to read Bazaar, the June cover will feature Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie.  Pass!

Ruffles Are Powerful, and Other Startling Insights from Vogue's Anna Wintour

So we’ve been avoiding the March issue of Vogue because, frankly, that cover photo of Jennifer Hudson bent over, mouth open in agony, scares the hell out of us.  But when we found the courage to flip open theVogue_march_jennifer_hudson magazine, we only had to make it past 150 pages of advertising to find something equally as frightening—Anna Wintour’s “Letter from the Editor.”  (Good thing we didn’t encounter “Life with André” in those pages, or we probably would have relegated this issue to use as a doorstop.  Or a bludgeon.  It’s heavy.)

Anyway, now that Kim France appears to have renewed her grasp on reality (for now, at least), it’s time to crown a new editor-in-chief whose monthly notes are completely lacking in pretty much every way possible.   

Let’s get cracking, shall we?  Unlike every other editor-in-chief on the planet, Anna’s letter requires two full pages (albeit with a healthy—and much-needed—15-page ad break in the middle).  Taking it from the top:

When we considered which face belonged on this month’s cover—this is our annual Power Issue—the name on the lips of my editors was Jennifer Hudson.  There is no more inspiring example of the power of talent and tenacity than her rise from America Idol reject to Golden Globe winner.

Right.  There is no victory more vindicating than Hudson’s, no tale of adversity more incredible.  American Idol contestants are apparently among the most down-trodden citizens of this planet.

The question of body image is a current one, and I can’t think of a more compelling and beautiful argument for the proposition that great fashion looks great on women of all sizes than the sight of Hudson in a Vera Wang dress on the red carpet.

On the red carpet, sure, but in the pages of the magazine?  Don’t hold your breath.

The model Natalia Vodianova is another woman whose charm and determination are as empowering as her beauty…

Oh, is beauty empowering?  That’s not what we’ve been told.

I’ve always believed that the great models develop the power to exert an individual influence—moral, aesthetic, commercial—on the culture.

Can someone please give us an example of a model having a “moral” influence?  Perhaps because it’s late at night, but we’re having trouble coming up with a single instance to justify Anna’s statement.  Unless Naomi Campbell hurling things at the help is somehow morally compelling.

(One thought about Ivanka: I’ve watched her since she was a teenager, and I continue to take great pleasure in seeing her develop into a woman of real substance.)

Sure, if substance is constituted by having your assistant help you cheat at Monopoly.

[Nancy Pelosi]’s stylish now, of course; but more importantly, she’s made history in becoming the first woman Speaker.

Good thing she mentioned that Speaker Pelosi’s stylish!  That’s the true accomplishment here, isn’t it?

Olivier Theyskens’s spectacular new dress for Nina Ricci, photographed by Irving Penn, is designed to resemble a bird about to take flight.  Jennifer Hudson aside, I can’t think of a more hopeful emblem of the power we celebrate this month.

This missive mentioned politicians, models, and Ivanka Trump, and a “megaruffle” dress and former reality-show contestant (yeah, yeah, we know she has an Oscar) are what represents power?  Funny, we thought power might involve something like the ability to, oh, write something meaningful to millions of women every single month, but we guess we were wrong.

Or we were right.  We bought the magazine and read every word she wrote, didn’t we?

Previously: Wintour: Believe In Yourself, Believe In Your Staff

Wintour: Believe In Yourself, Believe In Your Staff

Anna Wintour has some unorthodox ideas about what constitutes individualism.  Her “Letter from the Editor” (Vogue, January) manages to take designer Marc Jacobs’ inspiring case ofVogue_january_angelina_jolie self-determination and morph it into something downright insipid. She starts with the moral of Marc’s tale:

…a commitment to a singular point of view is the never-easy path but, ultimately, the most rewarding.

Sadly, this message completely disintegrates as Anna elucidates exactly what she means by “singular point of view.”

[Angelina Jolie] knows who she is and is happy to share that with the public with no press-agent interference.

And then:

Our Best-Dressed List features ten young women who get dressed every morning without the help of a stylist.

And finally:

For another example of going one’s own way…How fantastic to come upon such an extraordinary residence that was created without the help of a decorator!

And how fantastic to come upon such an extraordinarily elitist and overly simplified idea of individualism!  Could she find no one better to commend than a woman who picked her own paint colors?  Sorry, but we refuse to consider that trail-blazing.

On Planet Anna, it seems committing to that “singular point of view” requires only that one muddle through life without a publicist, stylist, or decorator.  No wonder she described their path as “never-easy”—she must feel terrible for those so-called individualists who somehow get through life without a staff.

The Week: Special Almost-All-Vogue Edition

•    A documentary crew will go behind the scenes at Vogue as Anna Wintour and her minions put together the massive September issue over the next eight months. 

•    In a series of apparently unrelated observations, James Brady queries Glamour’s Cindi Leive about her rumored rivalry with Cosmopolitan editor-in-chief Kate White, compares her clothing to Lord Byron’s, and describes her as “tallish.”  Thanks for the insight, Jim.

•    PETA activists picketed Vogue’s holiday party, while straight men boycotted Allure’s event.

•    And Angelina Jolie reportedly clashed with Vogue over the writer hired to profile her for the January issue.  Angelina vs. Anna?  We hope they got that on film.

Wintour Fascinates Walters, Bores the Rest of Us

Anna Wintour may have been named one of the most fascinating people of 2006, but Barbara Walters’ remarkably superficial interview with the Vogue editor-in-chief never even veered close to interesting.

The whole four minutes of laughably easy questions is chock-full of Anna reciting boilerplate.  Still, we did enjoy Anna’s assertion that she was “100 percent behind” The Devil Wears Prada.   Sure, Anna, and the people of Kazakhstan are huge fans of Borat.

The Week: Anna Wintour More Fascinating to Herself Than to Anyone Else

•    Anna Wintour is named one of Barbara Walters’ “Ten Most Fascinating People.”  Clearly,Anna_wintour_new_york_post Wintour agrees with the “fascinating” verdict—she has three portraits of herself hanging in her office.

•    Brandon Holley tries too hard to stay in touch with her 20-something audience by throwing herself a 40th birthday party complete with a street fight and police presence. 

•    Feel like crashing holiday parties?  Gawker and WWD have dates and locations. 

•    Lucky’s hired a stylist.  We really were concerned about Kim France’s ability to dress herself.

•    And this week’s cautionary tale comes from former Allure staffer Molly Friedman, who, after soliciting beauty products for the magazine and then selling them on eBay, is “pretty much banned from Condé Nast for life.”  Which we think is supposed to be an even worse fate than actually having to work at Condé Nast.

Photo of Anna Wintour from the New York Post

The Week: No Further Cameron Diaz Updates Planned

  • And if you’ll indulge us in some self-promotion, we have a (somewhat serious) short article, “Youth and Consequences,” about fashion mags’ treatment of aging, in the Winter 2007 issue of Bitch magazine, which goes on sale this week. Further incentive to pick it up: Bitch’s always spot-on  “Jane Petty Criticism Corner.”

The Week: A Preponderance of Potential Disasters

  • Looking for work?  You too can be the next Andrea Sachs Lauren Weisberger brutally overworked Anna Wintour minion.

The Week: We'll Never Believe Lauren Weisberger Again

The Devil Wears Prada’s production designers reveal that Miranda Priestly’s movie office was nearly identical to Anna Wintour’s real-life digs at Vogue.  Now, in what’s obviously a totally coincidental move, Wintour is redecorating.  Way to squelch those claims that the movie wasn’t based on Wintour’s reign of terror at the magazine, everyone.

Copyranter weighs in on Jane’s relentless campaign of self-promotion.  Either he doesn’t get it because he’s not part of the target demographic, or these ads are misguided and annoying.  We’ll let you guess where we stand on the issue (hint: the latter).

And luxury jeweler H. Stern is reaching out to the five people— all of whom must work at Glamour— who weren’t repulsed by Ashley Judd’s therapy confessions.  They’ve hired the actress to appear in an ad campaign in September’s Vogue and W.      

This Week: It's All Anna Wintour's Fault

While we were slacking off this week, here’s what else was going on:

Did Elle make up Hilary Duff’s attestation of virginity?  Did anyone believe it in the first place?  Does anyone over the age of fourteen even care?

Jane wants readers to contact editors with story ideas.  Remember when Sassy did its annual reader-produced issue?  This is like that, only lazier and not as innovative.

This week’s most bizarre internet mashup features legendary Cosmo editor Helen Gurley Brown lecturing how to have an affair over salacious news footage dissecting the breakup of Peter Cook and Christie Brinkley.  If only Cook had followed HGB’s helpful and totally outdated advice.

And this is old, but too good to pass up.  Apparently, Anna Wintour is considered so powerful that she gets blamed for everything—including the economic performance of companies she isn’t even affiliated with. 

The Week: Banish Celebs from Covers, Make Life Easier

Elsewhere this week:

Kirsten Dunst’s shoot for Vogue goes terribly wrong, proving yet again why models should reclaim magazine covers.

Interning—or, in this case, is it “interning”?— at Teen Vogue will get you nowhere.  However, if your mother edits the grown-up version, all sorts of opportunities present themselves.

Continually managing to be ever more insipid, Cosmo announces its sixth annual “Media Man” contest.  You know, because there just isn’t enough space in the magazine for all the objectifying that needs to be done.

Kim France Requires Attention, Pajamas

In what’s becoming a tradition around here, we now present a selection from Lucky’s “Editor’s Letter,” July—ironically titled “Summer with Dignity”—wherein Kim France tells us more about herself than we ever wanted to know.  Are you sensing a pattern?

“You need a dress in which all you can feel between the fabric and your skin is air, that on nights when you can’t be bothered to change can double as a nightgown.”

There you have it: the editor-in-chief of a national magazine just admitted that she doesn’t wear any kind of undergarments.  How else could you feel nothing but air between the dress and your skin?  Normally, this wouldn’t interest us, except that the Calypso Christiane Celle dress featured as meeting these criteria is white.  As in see-through.  As in choosing to wear the gown without the proper underpinnings could make quite a statement.

(We briefly considered that Kim’s implied suggestion to wear a sheer dress without underwear was supposed to be fashion advice.  It is, after all, the ultimate way to avoid unsightly panty lines and bra bulges. But we digress. And perhaps we take things too literally.)

Then there’s the revelation that she sometimes wears her street clothes to bed. What, is she trying to save a few quarters on laundry? It’s not a big deal, really, except that it (like her divorce) never needed to be announced to the world via a page in her magazine.  If you’re the editor of a fashion magazine, don’t you need to carefully craft your image? Wouldn’t you want to follow Anna Wintour’s lead and maintain a mysterious public persona? And perhaps most importantly—to us, anyway—wouldn’t you want the world to believe you had an entire bureau full of designer sleepwear?

Or, failing all that, wouldn’t you at least want your readers to believe that you’re not frantically seeking attention by treading perilously close to TMI territory every single time you pen a few paragraphs for your magazine?

Yeah, that’s what we thought.

The Week: What Didn't Happen on Glossy Paper

Here’s what else happened this week:

Glossed Over—that’s right, the very website you’re reading now—has joined the legions on MySpace. Validate us by adding us to your friends list.

Fashion experts decreed in the New York Times that the wardrobe in The Devil Wears Prada is not even close to what actual people who work in fashion wear. Of course, one of the more outspoken critics was Elle’s Anne Slowey, and we trust her judgment about as much as we trust that Anna Wintour is nothing like TDWP’s Miranda Priestly.

Jossip got hot and bothered about the prospect of eating pizza with Brandon Holley. We’d like to attend so we can query the Jane editor-in-chief about her drinking habits. Think that’s the kind of feedback she’s looking for?

And finally, The Devil Wears Prada hits theaters today. We can’t wait to see if the whole thing is more palatable on film than it was on paper—and to check out that wardrobe for ourselves.  We’ll be sure to discuss it next week. See you then!

Bonnie Fuller Equally Insensitive to Everyone

Former Glamour editor-in-chief Bonnie Fuller, not satisfied to merely be running Star, has penned a tell-all Bonnie_fuller book with the laborious title—take a deep breath if you’re reading aloud—The Joys of Much Too Much: Go for the Big Life—The Great Career, the Perfect Guy, and Everything Else You’ve Ever Wanted. Taking a cue from the book’s title, a story called “Onetime Editor of Glamour Writes of Some Last Straws” appeared yesterday in the New York Times business section.  From their article about the soon-to-be-classic tome:

If her experience at Glamour has not permanently shut Ms. Fuller out of ever working at Condé Nast again, perhaps a dig in the book at Ms. [Anna] Wintour will.

Ms. Wintour, she writes, “supposedly once said that a woman should carry only a small clutch bag because a shoulder strap ruins the line of the clothes.”

Ms. Fuller ignored the small-bag dictum. “I'd call my on-the-way-to-work look more Ellis Island than Fifth Avenue,” she wrote. “I have more important ways to spend my time in the morning than agonizing over my choice of tote.”

And what an apt comparison, too, Bonnie. Schlepping up Madison Avenue, Kate Spade bag stuffed with gym shoes and an extra sweater, is exactly like emigrating to the United States with only the meager amount of possessions you can carry on your back. Exactly.

According to the Times’s description of the book, Bonnie “admits repeatedly to errors in judgment.” Sure, it’s not quite on par with revealing the name of an alleged rape victim, but we wonder if this particular gaffe made the list.

Anna Wintour Still Hated, Still Famous

The New York Times takes a less-than-incisive look at Anna Wintour, questioning her position as the fashion-world figurehead most often attacked by animal rights protesters.  Our favorite part of the article:

It may strike some as trivial or humorous when the Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour—so often caricatured as some kind of Mme. Satan in an astrakhan wrap—gets a pie in the face from activists, who profess to be standing up for oppressed chinchillas.

Um, caricatured?

The piece inevitably surmises that a large portion of the population suffers from a massive dose of Wintour envy, which they act upon by throwing pie tins full of “bloody matter” at her.  Because that’s a totally rational way to deal with those emotions.

Our take is this:  Wintour’s a target because she’s famous and imminently recognizable.  Perhaps she could prevent further ambushes by lowering her profile (or, you know, skipping shows altogether), but we’re not holding our breath on that one.  There is no such thing as bad press, right?

News: Identifying with an Editor (For Once)

Cindi Leive, editor-in-chief of Glamour (you know, the only magazine that believes cooking chicken for a man will force him to propose) spoke to WWD about judging nominees for the National Magazine Award.

“After reading these top-notch magazines for two solid days, you come home with this huge laundry list of things you want to either change, burn, rip up or destroy about your own magazine.”

We often feel that way about Glamour, too, Cindi.

Vogue_espana_1And Spanish Vogue’s March issue (seen here) is, at 1,006 pages and nearly six pounds, now the largest edition the international conglomerate has published, handily shattering American Vogue’s September 2004 record of 832 pages.

We’re eagerly awaiting the inevitable expansion of upcoming American issues of Vogue—that’s the competitive spirit we’ve come to expect from Anna Wintour—but only if they follow European tradition and include a free gift as an incentive. We’re thinking a wheelbarrow would be appropriate. 

Wintour, PETA Adjust Travel Plans

Women’s Wear Daily reports that Vogue editor Anna Wintour will not be attending any runway shows in Paris during the upcoming Fashion Week, opting instead for a handful of private previews.  While she plans to appear at shows in both London and Milan, a flack contends that Wintour cannot be out of the office for the entire run of events and will therefore forgo the French portion of the international fashion circuit.

We’re absolutely, positively, 100 percent certain that her decision has absolutely nothing to do with what happened the last time she attended a fashion show in Paris.

Another incident in the war between PETA and Anna Wintour: Unless Prada Made That Pink Lingerie

Wintour Takes On the Most Important Meal of the Day

Yesterday’s “Lowdown” in the New York Daily News pondered the important matter of elevator etiquette:

Did Anna Wintour give the fisheye to a young lady who brought a big, steaming omelet and a jumbo muffin into the same elevator with the Vogue editrix at Conde Naste [sic] headquarters the other morning?

Predictably, a witness says Wintour did indeed indicate displeasure. Even more predictably, Wintour’s rep—she wouldn’t deign to speak to the Daily News herself, of course—decried the story as “total rubbish.”

This alleged incident, minor though it appears, has taught us two small but valuable lessons:  First, never schedule Anna Wintour for a breakfast meeting.  And second, no encounter with Anna Wintour is too insignificant to print. 

via Gawker