Bazaar: Bare Your Body to Boost the Economy
In an essay in the February issue of Bazaar, Derek Blasberg tries valiantly to explain the phenomenon he calls "The Sexification of Fashion."
What is this "sexification," and how do we know it's occurring? I've read his article three times and I'm not exactly certain. But it has something to do with Megan Fox earning a lot of money as the face of Emporio Armani Underwear, Jenna Jameson wearing a tasteful blue frock on Oprah, and pop stars like Lady Gaga, Rihanna, and Shakira merely existing.
Blasberg's theory rests on two things: a catalog of strange ideas about how women should express their sexuality, and—you guessed it!—the economy. He writes:
A woman tarting up her lifestyle, according to many, can be traced back to a very familiar recent event: the Great Recession.
Riiiight. Like Lady Gaga doesn’t wear pants because she can’t afford them.
Spoken like someone who’s never paid for birth control!“Maybe you can’t afford a new condo or a couture blouse,” [Simon Doonan] teases, “but hanky panky is free!”
New York’s Upper East Side novelist Jill Kargman argues that a woman feeling a renewed sense of sexual energy and power in the light of the recession shouldn’t be surprising. “Since men’s egos are so wrapped up in their bank accounts, maybe their sex drive mirrors the Dow?” she wonders. “Perhaps women are trying to play into their fantasies more to lift spirits and electroshock them back from the dead?”
Maybe so! I mean, it is our responsibility as women to use our bodies to ensure men feel good about themselves at all times.
“Why dress meekly when things look bleak?” the designer Antonio Berardi asks.
Excellent point! So I assume Berardi wore a see-through singlet and hot pants during this interview. Men are also subject to the new dress code, right?
And every once in a while, fashion is dictated by men who justify objectifying women by claiming to know how women feel.He agrees with Kargman that in this economy, it’s all about a sexual woman and says, “Every once in a while fashion is dictated not by trends but by the need to feel sexy, to be adored, and to be wanted. Now more so than ever it’s about playing the female card.”
By the way, what constitutes “playing the female card”? Possessing ovaries?
Still, the midst of all this trenchant socio-economic analysis, there is some ever-so-helpful fashion advice. For instance:
…why not try an over-the-knee boot? It’s official: they’re not just for prostitutes anymore!And, to close the article, this charming reminder:
What a coincidence! “Just too much and totally wrong”—much like this article.But [Berardi] warns novices…: “Slutty is just too much and totally wrong.” In other words, ladies, wear underwear!

Fabulous post. I completely agree with you.
Posted by: Arushi Khosla | January 11, 2010 at 11:22 PM
You truly are one of my favorite writers. Perceptive, smart, witty, brilliant. Thank you.
Posted by: Linnea | January 12, 2010 at 02:08 AM
Wow. Are you sure this wasn't an Onion *parody* of an actual fashion magazine? Or is civilization actually collapsing around us?
Posted by: Polly | January 12, 2010 at 09:42 AM
You have no idea how much I missed this blog. It is EXACTLY what I needed to kick off the new year. And this is a fantastic article! I'm almost tempted to read the craziness for myself, but I'm afraid I'd get brain damage from slapping my forehead too much. I don't know how you stand it.
Posted by: Autumn | January 12, 2010 at 10:27 AM
". . . a woman feeling a renewed sense of sexual energy and power in the light of the recession shouldn’t be surprising."
Oh, really? I thought she'd be too busy worrying about how to pay for her next round of health-care bills. Stupid priorities!
Posted by: Rio | January 12, 2010 at 11:23 AM
Couldn’t agree more…. “Spoken like someone who’s never paid for birth control!” However I do believe that in our country sex is more relevant than ever now. So I see where he was trying to go, after reading his article and the reviews I have googled the word ‘sexification’. The first thing that came up was quite an interesting site. It focuses on bringing you the latest in sex-centric news ect.. you should check it out sexification.com
Posted by: Janice | January 12, 2010 at 02:55 PM
Haha, priceless. But on a somber note, disturbing. Very, very glad to see new posts!
Posted by: Jessica M. | January 15, 2010 at 07:43 AM
I don't know what to say other than "ugh."
Posted by: Vanessa | January 16, 2010 at 07:31 PM
Speaking on behalf of the trans* lady contingent, I can say that possessing ovaries definitely does not count as playing the female card. ;)
"Slutty is just too much and totally wrong," but "it’s all about a sexual woman" and her "need to feel sexy, to be adored, and to be wanted"? All righty then. Cause that's not a mixed message at all.
Posted by: Cloelia | March 22, 2010 at 07:23 PM
And God what did they do to Miley? I could hardly recognize her on this photo. She is still a young girl, she doesn't need so much photoshop people!
Posted by: graphics tablet | June 01, 2010 at 03:34 AM
Beautiful Girl....Pretty Face She has....
http://www.vivamagonline.com/CoverStories_Cynthia.php
Posted by: Bazaar Fashion | June 09, 2010 at 01:13 AM