Lowest Common Denominator: Allure, August
33,683: Number of free items Allure is giving away in August, according to the cover
10: Pounds lighter, years younger, and times happier editor-in-chief Linda Wells claimed to appear after a bra fitting
$39.95: Price of faux-leather strapless dress from H&M that’s named as a “must” in “Fashion Cravings”
0: Probability, estimated, that any major magazine’s fashion editor has ever actually worn faux leather from H&M
Far, far too much: According to swimwear designer Malia Mills, the amount of maintenance a suit needs to avoid fading and stretching. Daily rinsing and a secondary suit just for wear in hot tubs? Like it isn’t hard enough to find one!
95: Page on which an advertisement for Latisse appears, asking “Not enough lashes?”
Boundless: The joy I’m apparently missing by not sleeping with my hairstylist, according to “Dirty Blondes.” The article claims stylist-client affairs are a “female pasha fantasy”
Heaps: Amount I loved “Time Warp” on page 141, wherein a fashion historian and a history professor discuss the realism of period-movie hair and makeup. More like this, please!
6: In “The New Cocoon,” number of items made of fur, including oh-so-practical shearling gauntlets
None: Amount of the diet advice in “The Fashion Insiders’ Diet” that’s novel to anyone who’s read a women’s magazine before. Really? Eat a piece of fruit before going out to dinner?
Tons: Disbelief inspired by this sentence in the diet’s introduction: “Models aren’t the only ones who feel pressure to be thin, and fitting into a sample size can sometimes feel like a job requirement—if not exactly a virtue—when you work in fashion.” Because, you know, that's just the way it is.
1989: Year from which Allure must have stolen the fluorescent-themed fashion spread “Plugged In”

Dear Glossed Over,
I am bored with my usual magazines and you seem to talk about Allure a lot. Is it really worth my time?
Posted by: Samantha | July 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Latisse. Has it really come to that? I mean, cancer and AIDS are still uncured and yet, we've got the cure for scanty eyelashes.
Doesn't it amaze you sometimes?
Posted by: MrsBug | July 29, 2009 at 07:49 AM
Latisse is actually a glaucoma drug called Lumigan. In clinical trials they discovered that application of Lumigan resulted in longer, thicker lashes so they rushed a trial for Latisse through the FDA to capitalize on the side effect - http://blogs.consumerreports.org/health/2009/03/drug-promises-fuller-lashes-but-at-what-cost.html
It wasn't born from intensive lash research, but legitimate clinical trials for a glaucoma treatment. I would think that preventing blindess is a fairly noble cause.
Posted by: fuzzykitten | October 03, 2009 at 09:58 PM
よろしくおねがいします。good good nice
Posted by: 出会い | December 08, 2009 at 03:45 AM
競馬予想
Posted by: 競馬予想 | January 02, 2010 at 11:24 PM